OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Fold

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Samsung Galaxy Fold (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 44/100 (a 42-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4380); the main camera is 200 MP vs 12 MP; the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 824,513); the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is thinner (8.2mm vs 15.5mm).

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold by 42 points (86/100 vs 44/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Performance 89
Display 84
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 54
Value for money 84
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Performance 54
Display 77
Camera 20
Battery 38
Portability 20
Value for money
What makes OPPO Reno 16 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 824513
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 968
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 2731
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4380 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 15W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (89/100 vs 54/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 20/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 38/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 77/100)
  • Better portability (54/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Fold better?

  • Overall rating 44/100
Comparison verdict

Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy Fold, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 42 points higher (86/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (89/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold (89/100 vs 54/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold (94/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold (83/100 vs 38/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold (54/100 vs 20/100).

OPPO Reno 16 Pro: The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy Fold: The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification OPPO Reno 16 Pro Samsung Galaxy Fold
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500s Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
AnTuTu 3079298 824513
Geekbench Single 2680 968
Geekbench Multi 8358 2731
Display 6.8" AMOLED 7.3" Dynamic AMOLED
Resolution 2772x1272 1536x2152
Refresh rate 120 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 4380 mAh
Charging 80W 15W
Wireless charging 50W 15W
Main camera 200 MP 12 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 12 MP
Front camera 50 MP 10 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 9.0 (Pie)
Brightness (peak) 3600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm 160.9×62.9×15.5 mm
Weight 263 g
Launch price $661
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • Main: 200MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera
Samsung Galaxy Fold
  • Main: 12MP f/f/1.5
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
20
camera
Display comparison
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1272
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Samsung Galaxy Fold
  • 7.3" Dynamic AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1536x2152
  • Refresh rate: —
77
display
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery
Samsung Galaxy Fold
  • 4380 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • Wireless: 15W
38
battery
Overall performance score

We compared OPPO Reno 16 Pro and Samsung Galaxy Fold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OPPO Reno 16 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
86/100
3079298 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Fold Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
44/100 -273.5%
824513 AnTuTu

OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy Fold by 273.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
$661
Samsung Galaxy Fold
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold (89/100 vs 54/100).

display

In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 77/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold (94/100 vs 20/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold (83/100 vs 38/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold (54/100 vs 20/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Fold?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Fold by 42 points (86/100 vs 44/100).

What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Fold?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Samsung Galaxy Fold — 44/100.

Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Fold?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 20/100).

Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy Fold?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on performance (89/100 vs 54/100).

Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy Fold?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better fit for everyday use.