OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A14

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Samsung Galaxy A14 (2023) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330; launch prices were $661 and $200. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 39/100 (a 47-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 607,137).

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 by 47 points (86/100 vs 39/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Performance 89
Display 84
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 54
Value for money 84
Samsung Galaxy A14
Performance 47
Display 54
Camera 16
Battery 43
Portability 46
Value for money 40
What makes OPPO Reno 16 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 607137
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 952
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 1963
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 15W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (89/100 vs 47/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 16/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 54/100)
  • Better portability (54/100 vs 46/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A14 better?
  • Cheaper at launch: $200 vs $661

  • Overall rating 39/100
Comparison verdict

Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy A14, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 47 points higher (86/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (89/100 vs 47/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 43/100). Value score: OPPO Reno 16 Pro — 84/100, Samsung Galaxy A14 — 40/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (89/100 vs 47/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (84/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (94/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (83/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (54/100 vs 46/100).

OPPO Reno 16 Pro: The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy A14: The Samsung Galaxy A14 is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification OPPO Reno 16 Pro Samsung Galaxy A14
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500s Samsung Exynos 1330
AnTuTu 3079298 607137
Geekbench Single 2680 952
Geekbench Multi 8358 1963
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.6" IPS LCD
Resolution 2772x1272 1080x2408
Refresh rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 80W 15W
Wireless charging 50W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 67
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 50 MP 13 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 4GB / 6GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 64GB / 128GB
OS Android 16 Android 13, One UI 5
Brightness (peak) 3600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm 167.7×78.0×9.1 mm
Weight 201 g
Launch price $661 $200
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • Main: 200MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera
Samsung Galaxy A14
  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 13MP
16
camera
Display comparison
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1272
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Samsung Galaxy A14
  • 6.6" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2408
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
54
display
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery
Samsung Galaxy A14
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 15W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery
Overall performance score

We compared OPPO Reno 16 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A14, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OPPO Reno 16 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
86/100
3079298 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy A14 Samsung Exynos 1330
39/100 -407.2%
607137 AnTuTu

OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy A14 by 407.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
$661
Samsung Galaxy A14
$200

Launch price difference: $461. Samsung Galaxy A14 was $461 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (89/100 vs 47/100).

display

In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (84/100 vs 54/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (94/100 vs 16/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 (83/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (54/100 vs 46/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy A14?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A14 by 47 points (86/100 vs 39/100).

What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A14?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Samsung Galaxy A14 — 39/100.

Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy A14?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 16/100).

Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy A14?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on performance (89/100 vs 47/100).

Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy A14?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy A14 is a better fit for everyday use.