OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A03s
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Samsung Galaxy A03s (2021) runs on the MediaTek Helio P35; launch prices were $661 and $130. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 25/100 (a 61-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 13 MP; the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 199,111); the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A03s doesn't.
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Samsung Galaxy A03s
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 199111
- Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 476
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 828
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (89/100 vs 19/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 32/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 50/100)
- Cheaper at launch: $130 vs $661
- Overall rating 25/100
Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs the Samsung Galaxy A03s, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 61 points higher (86/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (89/100 vs 19/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 52/100). Value score: OPPO Reno 16 Pro — 84/100, Samsung Galaxy A03s — 30/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (89/100 vs 19/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (84/100 vs 32/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (94/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (83/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A03s are nearly equal (54/100 vs 50/100).
| Specification | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | Samsung Galaxy A03s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | MediaTek Helio P35 | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 199111 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2680 | 476 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8358 | 828 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 2GB / 3GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | — | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | — | 196 g | |
| Launch price | $661 | $130 |
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy A03s
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A03s
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy A03s
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared OPPO Reno 16 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A03s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy A03s by 1446.5% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $531. Samsung Galaxy A03s was $531 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (89/100 vs 19/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (84/100 vs 32/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (94/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (83/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A03s are nearly equal (54/100 vs 50/100).
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy A03s?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s by 61 points (86/100 vs 25/100).
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A03s?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Samsung Galaxy A03s — 25/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy A03s?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy A03s?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on performance (89/100 vs 19/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 Pro over the Samsung Galaxy A03s?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy A03s is a better fit for everyday use.