OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs Vivo X300

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Vivo X300 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9300; launch prices were $661 and $499. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 78/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 2,555,121).

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro edges out the Vivo X300 by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
Performance 89
Display 84
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 54
Value for money 84
Vivo X300
Performance 83
Display 84
Camera 78
Battery 69
Portability 55
Value for money 82
What makes OPPO Reno 16 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 2555121
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 2142
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 7125
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W

  • Higher performance (89/100 vs 83/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 78/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 69/100)
What makes Vivo X300 better?
  • Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $661

  • Better portability (55/100 vs 54/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the OPPO Reno 16 Pro vs the Vivo X300, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 8 points higher (86/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 69/100). Value score: OPPO Reno 16 Pro — 84/100, Vivo X300 — 82/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100. In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (83/100 vs 69/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (55/100 vs 54/100).

OPPO Reno 16 Pro: The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo X300: The Vivo X300 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification OPPO Reno 16 Pro Vivo X300
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500s MediaTek Dimensity 9300
AnTuTu 3079298 2555121
Geekbench Single 2680 2142
Geekbench Multi 8358 7125
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2772x1272 2800x1260
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 80W 80W
Wireless charging 50W 40W
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 14
Brightness (peak) 3600 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm 150.6×71.9×8.0 mm
Weight 206 g
Launch price $661 $499
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • Main: 200MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera
Vivo X300
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2772x1272
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Vivo X300
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
  • 7000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery
Vivo X300
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 40W
69
battery
Overall performance score

We compared OPPO Reno 16 Pro and Vivo X300, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OPPO Reno 16 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500s
86/100
3079298 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9300
78/100 -20.5%
2555121 AnTuTu

OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads Vivo X300 by 20.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
$661
Vivo X300
$499

Launch price difference: $162. Vivo X300 was $162 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 (94/100 vs 78/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (83/100 vs 69/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro are nearly equal (55/100 vs 54/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Vivo X300?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro edges out the Vivo X300 by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Vivo X300?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Vivo X300 — 78/100.

Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Vivo X300?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 78/100).

Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro or the Vivo X300?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on performance (89/100 vs 83/100).

Should you choose the OPPO Reno 16 Pro over the Vivo X300?

The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.