Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Pro, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $261 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 58/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 902,815); the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro is noticeably lighter (185g vs 230g).
Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 185g vs 230g
- Cheaper: $261 vs $950
- Better portability (70/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 902815
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2813
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 56/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
- Better value for money (94/100 vs 66/100)
Comparing the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 33 points higher (91/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 56/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 46/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (94/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro (96/100 vs 56/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro (85/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (70/100 vs 39/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro (94/100 vs 66/100).
| Specification | Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Pro | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 902815 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2392 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, Nothing OS 3.2 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 164.0×78.0×7.8 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 185 g | 230 g | |
| Price | $261 | $950 |
Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro by 78.7% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $689. Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro is cheaper by $689.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro (99/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro (96/100 vs 56/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro (85/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (70/100 vs 39/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro (94/100 vs 66/100).
Which is better: the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro by 33 points (91/100 vs 58/100).
What is the rating of the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 56/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Nothing CMF Phone 2 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.