Nokia XR30 vs ZTE Blade A72 4G
The Nokia XR30 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695, while the ZTE Blade A72 4G (2022) runs on the Unisoc. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia XR30 leads — 46/100 vs 33/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Blade A72 4G has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 64 MP vs 13 MP; the Nokia XR30 has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Blade A72 4G doesn't.
Nokia XR30
ZTE Blade A72 4G
- Faster charging: 33W vs 5W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (43/100 vs 10/100)
- Better display (66/100 vs 53/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4600 mAh
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 37/100)
Comparing the Nokia XR30 vs the ZTE Blade A72 4G, the Nokia XR30 scores 13 points higher (46/100 vs 33/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 leads (43/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A72 4G leads (51/100 vs 37/100). In the "display" category, the Nokia XR30 is a bit better (66/100 vs 53/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A72 4G (43/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A72 4G is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100).
| Specification | Nokia XR30 | ZTE Blade A72 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Unisoc | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2003 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 5W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 3GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 11, MiFavor 11 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | — | 168.0×77.5×9.4 mm | |
| Weight | — | 214 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Nokia XR30
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Blade A72 4G
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Nokia XR30
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Blade A72 4G
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Nokia XR30
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A72 4G
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
display
In the "display" category, the Nokia XR30 is a bit better (66/100 vs 53/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A72 4G (43/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A72 4G is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100).
Which is better: the Nokia XR30 or the ZTE Blade A72 4G?
The Nokia XR30 is noticeably better than the ZTE Blade A72 4G — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia XR30 and the ZTE Blade A72 4G?
The Nokia XR30 has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the ZTE Blade A72 4G — 33/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia XR30 or the ZTE Blade A72 4G?
The Nokia XR30 leads on camera score (43/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Nokia XR30 over the ZTE Blade A72 4G?
The Nokia XR30 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Blade A72 4G is a better fit for everyday use.