Nokia XR30 vs ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G
The Nokia XR30 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695, while the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G leads — 65/100 vs 46/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G is faster in AnTuTu (1,119,714 vs 592,015).
Nokia XR30
ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G
- Overall rating 46/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 1119714 vs 592015
- Better Geekbench Single: 1488 vs 905
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3373 vs 2003
- Higher performance (63/100 vs 46/100)
- Better camera (71/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (41/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 66/100)
Comparing the Nokia XR30 vs the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G, the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G scores 19 points higher (65/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G leads (63/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G leads (71/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (63/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (89/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (71/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G and the Nokia XR30 are nearly equal (41/100 vs 37/100).
| Specification | Nokia XR30 | ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | 1119714 | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | 1488 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2003 | 3373 | |
| Display | 6.7" | 6.7" Super Amoled | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 4600 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | — | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 44 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | — | 161.5×73.0×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | — | 188 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia XR30
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
Nokia XR30
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G
- 6.7" Super Amoled
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Nokia XR30
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G
- 4600 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia XR30 and ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G leads Nokia XR30 by 47.1% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (63/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (89/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (71/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G and the Nokia XR30 are nearly equal (41/100 vs 37/100).
Which is better: the Nokia XR30 or the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G?
The ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G is noticeably better than the Nokia XR30 — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia XR30 and the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G?
The Nokia XR30 has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G — 65/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia XR30 or the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G?
The ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G leads on camera score (71/100 vs 43/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia XR30 or the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G?
The ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G leads on performance (63/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the Nokia XR30 over the ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G?
The Nokia XR30 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 31 Ultra 5G is a better fit for active users.