Nokia XR30 vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

The Nokia XR30 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads — 71/100 vs 46/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4600); the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is faster in AnTuTu (1,294,871 vs 592,015).

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Nokia XR30 by 25 points (71/100 vs 46/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Nokia XR30

Performance 46
Display 66
Camera 43
Battery 37
Portability —
Value for money —

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

Performance 68
Display 80
Camera 86
Battery 56
Portability 52
Value for money —

What makes Nokia XR30 better?


  • Overall rating 46/100

What makes ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 1294871 vs 592015
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1662 vs 905
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 4188 vs 2101
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4600 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 33W

  • Higher performance (68/100 vs 46/100)
  • Better camera (86/100 vs 43/100)
  • Longer battery life (56/100 vs 37/100)
  • Better display (80/100 vs 66/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia XR30 vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition scores 25 points higher (71/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (68/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (86/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (56/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (68/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (80/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Nokia XR30 (86/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (56/100 vs 37/100).

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition: The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.

Specs comparison

Specification Nokia XR30 ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
AnTuTu 592015 1294871
Geekbench Single 905 1662
Geekbench Multi 2101 4188
Display 6.7" 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 1116x2480
Refresh rate — 120 Hz
Battery 4600 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 33W 80W
Main camera 64 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 64 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 64 MP
Front camera 16 MP 16 MP
RAM 6GB 12GB / 18GB
Storage 128GB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13 Android 12, MyOS 12
Brightness (peak) — 1500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 —
Dimensions — 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm
Weight — 204 g
Launch price — —

Camera comparison

Nokia XR30

  • Main: 64MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
43
camera

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

  • Main: 64MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 64MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 16MP
86
camera

Display comparison

Nokia XR30

  • 6.7"
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: —
66
display

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1116x2480
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Battery and charging

Nokia XR30

  • 4600 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
37
battery

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
56
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Nokia XR30 and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nokia XR30 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
46/100
592015 AnTuTu
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
71/100 +54.3%
1294871 AnTuTu

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads Nokia XR30 by 54.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (68/100 vs 46/100).

display

In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (80/100 vs 66/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Nokia XR30 (86/100 vs 43/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (56/100 vs 37/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Nokia XR30 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Nokia XR30 by 25 points (71/100 vs 46/100).

What is the rating of the Nokia XR30 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The Nokia XR30 has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nokia XR30 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 43/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nokia XR30 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on performance (68/100 vs 46/100).

Should you choose the Nokia XR30 over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.