Nokia XR30 vs ZTE Axon 40
The Nokia XR30 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695, while the ZTE Axon 40 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 leads — 58/100 vs 46/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4600); the ZTE Axon 40 is faster in AnTuTu (1,010,069 vs 592,015).
Nokia XR30
ZTE Axon 40
- Overall rating 46/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 1010069 vs 592015
- Better Geekbench Single: 1298 vs 905
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3520 vs 2003
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4600 mAh
- Higher performance (61/100 vs 46/100)
- Better camera (51/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (73/100 vs 66/100)
Comparing the Nokia XR30 vs the ZTE Axon 40, the ZTE Axon 40 scores 12 points higher (58/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 leads (61/100 vs 46/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 leads (52/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (61/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (73/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (52/100 vs 37/100).
| Specification | Nokia XR30 | ZTE Axon 40 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2003 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.7" | 6.7" | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | — | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 44 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 12 Snow Cone | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | — | 200 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia XR30
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Axon 40
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
Nokia XR30
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Axon 40
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia XR30
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia XR30 and ZTE Axon 40, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 40 leads Nokia XR30 by 41.4% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (61/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (73/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (52/100 vs 37/100).
Which is better: the Nokia XR30 or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 is noticeably better than the Nokia XR30 — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia XR30 and the ZTE Axon 40?
The Nokia XR30 has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the ZTE Axon 40 — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia XR30 or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 leads on camera score (51/100 vs 43/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia XR30 or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 leads on performance (61/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the Nokia XR30 over the ZTE Axon 40?
The Nokia XR30 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 is a better fit for active users.