Nokia G60 vs ZTE Axon 40
The Nokia G60 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695, while the ZTE Axon 40 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 leads — 58/100 vs 43/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 is faster in AnTuTu (1,010,069 vs 592,015).
Nokia G60
ZTE Axon 40
- Lighter: 190g vs 200g
- Better portability (59/100 vs 53/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 1010069 vs 592015
- Better Geekbench Single: 1298 vs 905
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3520 vs 2003
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (61/100 vs 46/100)
- Better camera (51/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 33/100)
- Better display (73/100 vs 66/100)
Comparing the Nokia G60 vs the ZTE Axon 40, the ZTE Axon 40 scores 15 points higher (58/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 leads (61/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 leads (51/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 leads (52/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Nokia G60 (61/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (73/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Nokia G60 (51/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Nokia G60 (52/100 vs 33/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia G60 is a bit better (59/100 vs 53/100).
| Specification | Nokia G60 | ZTE Axon 40 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2003 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.6" IPS LCD | 6.7" | |
| Resolution | 2408x1080 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 20W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 44 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | — | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12 Snow Cone | |
| Brightness (peak) | 400 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP52 | — | |
| Dimensions | 166.0×75.9×8.6 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 200 g | |
| Price | $329 | — |
Nokia G60
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 8MP
ZTE Axon 40
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
Nokia G60
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 2408x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia G60
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 20W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia G60 and ZTE Axon 40, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 40 leads Nokia G60 by 41.4% in our overall performance rating.
ZTE Axon 40
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Nokia G60 (61/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (73/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Nokia G60 (51/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Nokia G60 (52/100 vs 33/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia G60 is a bit better (59/100 vs 53/100).
Which is better: the Nokia G60 or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 is noticeably better than the Nokia G60 — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia G60 and the ZTE Axon 40?
The Nokia G60 has a MobileRank rating of 43/100, the ZTE Axon 40 — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia G60 or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 leads on camera score (51/100 vs 32/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia G60 or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 leads on performance (61/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the Nokia G60 over the ZTE Axon 40?
The Nokia G60 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 is a better fit for active users.