Nokia 8 V 5G UW vs ZTE Axon 40
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, while the ZTE Axon 40 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 leads — 58/100 vs 45/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4500); the ZTE Axon 40 is faster in AnTuTu (1,010,069 vs 597,974); the ZTE Axon 40 is noticeably lighter (200g vs 230g).
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
ZTE Axon 40
- Overall rating 45/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 1010069 vs 597974
- Better Geekbench Single: 1298 vs 799
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3520 vs 1836
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4500 mAh
- Lighter: 200g vs 230g
- Higher performance (61/100 vs 44/100)
- Better camera (51/100 vs 47/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 33/100)
- Better display (73/100 vs 63/100)
- Better portability (53/100 vs 30/100)
Comparing the Nokia 8 V 5G UW vs the ZTE Axon 40, the ZTE Axon 40 scores 13 points higher (58/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 leads (61/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 leads (52/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (61/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (73/100 vs 63/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 and the Nokia 8 V 5G UW are nearly equal (51/100 vs 47/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (52/100 vs 33/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (53/100 vs 30/100).
| Specification | Nokia 8 V 5G UW | ZTE Axon 40 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | |
| AnTuTu | 597974 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 799 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1836 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.0" IPS LCD | 6.7" | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | — | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 24 MP | 44 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | — | |
| Storage | 64GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 12 Snow Cone | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 171.9×78.6×9.0 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 230 g | 200 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 24MP
ZTE Axon 40
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
- 6.0" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Axon 40
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared Nokia 8 V 5G UW and ZTE Axon 40, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 40 leads Nokia 8 V 5G UW by 40.8% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (61/100 vs 44/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (73/100 vs 63/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 and the Nokia 8 V 5G UW are nearly equal (51/100 vs 47/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (52/100 vs 33/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (53/100 vs 30/100).
Which is better: the Nokia 8 V 5G UW or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 is noticeably better than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia 8 V 5G UW and the ZTE Axon 40?
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the ZTE Axon 40 — 58/100.
Which is more powerful: the Nokia 8 V 5G UW or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 leads on performance (61/100 vs 44/100).
Should you choose the Nokia 8 V 5G UW over the ZTE Axon 40?
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 is a better fit for active users.