Nokia 8 V 5G UW vs ZTE Blade A72 4G
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW (2020) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G, while the ZTE Blade A72 4G (2022) runs on the Unisoc. By overall MobileRank rating, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW leads — 18/100 vs 17/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Blade A72 4G has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 64 MP vs 13 MP; the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Blade A72 4G doesn't; the ZTE Blade A72 4G is noticeably lighter (214g vs 230g).
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
ZTE Blade A72 4G
- Faster charging: 18W vs 5W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (45/100 vs 0/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4500 mAh
- Lighter: 214g vs 230g
- Longer battery life (45/100 vs 24/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (32/100 vs 12/100)
Comparing the Nokia 8 V 5G UW vs the ZTE Blade A72 4G, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW scores 1 points higher (18/100 vs 17/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW leads (45/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A72 4G leads (45/100 vs 24/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the ZTE Blade A72 4G significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A72 4G (45/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A72 4G notably outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (45/100 vs 24/100). In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade A72 4G notably outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (32/100 vs 12/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Nokia 8 V 5G UW | ZTE Blade A72 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | Unisoc | |
| AnTuTu | 597974 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 799 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1836 | — | |
| Display | 6.0" IPS LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 5W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 24 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 3GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11, MiFavor 11 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 171.9×78.6×9.0 mm | 168.0×77.5×9.4 mm | |
| Weight | 230 g | 214 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 24MP
ZTE Blade A72 4G
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
- 6.0" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Blade A72 4G
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Nokia 8 V 5G UW
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A72 4G
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Blade A72 4G significantly outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A72 4G (45/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A72 4G notably outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (45/100 vs 24/100).
design
In the "design" category, the ZTE Blade A72 4G notably outperforms the Nokia 8 V 5G UW (32/100 vs 12/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Nokia 8 V 5G UW or the ZTE Blade A72 4G?
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW edges out the ZTE Blade A72 4G by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Nokia 8 V 5G UW and the ZTE Blade A72 4G?
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a MobileRank rating of 18/100, the ZTE Blade A72 4G — 17/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia 8 V 5G UW or the ZTE Blade A72 4G?
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW leads on camera score (45/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Nokia 8 V 5G UW over the ZTE Blade A72 4G?
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Blade A72 4G is a better fit for everyday use.