Nokia C2 2nd Edition vs ZTE Blade A72 4G
Comparing the Nokia C2 2nd Edition (2022) and the ZTE Blade A72 4G (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Blade A72 4G leads — 17/100 vs 6/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Blade A72 4G has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 2400); the main camera is 5 MP vs 13 MP; the Nokia C2 2nd Edition is noticeably lighter (180g vs 214g).
Nokia C2 2nd Edition
ZTE Blade A72 4G
- Lighter: 180g vs 214g
- Better design/ergonomics (75/100 vs 32/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 2400 mAh
- Better main camera: 13MP vs 5MP
- Longer battery life (45/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Nokia C2 2nd Edition vs the ZTE Blade A72 4G, the ZTE Blade A72 4G scores 11 points higher (17/100 vs 6/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A72 4G leads (45/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the ZTE Blade A72 4G significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 2nd Edition (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A72 4G significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 2nd Edition (45/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Nokia C2 2nd Edition significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A72 4G (75/100 vs 32/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Nokia C2 2nd Edition | ZTE Blade A72 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Unisoc | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 5.7" IPS LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 480x960 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 2400 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 5W | |
| Main camera | 5 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 2 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 1GB / 2GB | 3GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 11, MiFavor 11 | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 154.0×75.9×10.0 mm | 168.0×77.5×9.4 mm | |
| Weight | 180 g | 214 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Nokia C2 2nd Edition
- Main: 5MP
- Front: 2MP
ZTE Blade A72 4G
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Nokia C2 2nd Edition
- 5.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 480x960
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Blade A72 4G
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Nokia C2 2nd Edition
- 2400 mAh
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A72 4G
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Blade A72 4G significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 2nd Edition (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A72 4G significantly outperforms the Nokia C2 2nd Edition (45/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Nokia C2 2nd Edition significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A72 4G (75/100 vs 32/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Nokia C2 2nd Edition or the ZTE Blade A72 4G?
The ZTE Blade A72 4G is noticeably better than the Nokia C2 2nd Edition — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Nokia C2 2nd Edition and the ZTE Blade A72 4G?
The Nokia C2 2nd Edition has a MobileRank rating of 6/100, the ZTE Blade A72 4G — 17/100.
Should you choose the Nokia C2 2nd Edition over the ZTE Blade A72 4G?
The Nokia C2 2nd Edition is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Blade A72 4G is a better fit for everyday use.