ZTE Blade A72 4G
ZTE · 2022 27.07.2026 · updated 28.07.2026
ZTE Blade A72 4G overview: rating 33/100, Unisoc chipset, 13 MP camera, 6000 mAh battery. Price unknown.
Specifications
| Processor | Unisoc |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD, 1080x2400, 90Hz |
| RAM | 3GB |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB |
| Battery | 6000 mAh · ≈11.3 hrs of active use* |
| Charging | 5W / No wireless charging |
| OS | Android 11, MiFavor 11 |
| Dimensions | 168.0 × 77.5 × 9.4 mm |
| Weight | 214g |
| NFC | no |
* battery life is an estimated figure based on capacity, display, and chipset — not a lab measurement.
Cameras
| Main | 13MP |
| Front | 5MP |
Benchmarks
Performance
Overview and verdict
The ZTE Blade A72 4G combines budget phone-level performance with a basic camera and a compact battery. The overall MobileRank rating is 33/100 (budget phone, 2022). The display runs at 90 Hz. Battery capacity is 6000 mAh, charging up to 5W (battery score: 51/100).
Pros
- 90 Hz display
Cons
- Modest camera capabilities
- Slow charging (5W)
- No wireless charging
- No telephoto camera
Frequently asked questions
What processor does the ZTE Blade A72 4G have?
The ZTE Blade A72 4G runs on the Unisoc chipset.
What is the ZTE Blade A72 4G's rating?
The ZTE Blade A72 4G scores 33 out of 100 in the MobileRank rating. Categories: camera 10/100, battery 51/100, display 53/100, portability 35/100.
What battery does the ZTE Blade A72 4G have?
The ZTE Blade A72 4G has a 6000 mAh battery with 5W charging. Battery score: 51/100.
Is the ZTE Blade A72 4G worth buying?
The ZTE Blade A72 4G has no pronounced profile: its best category is display (53/100), its weakest camera (10/100). Overall rating — 33/100 (budget phone).
Device profile
Category scores
The score is built from the five categories below (weights are in the methodology); 62% of the weight is known. Value for money is computed separately and is not part of the overall score. Missing data: Performance — these categories are excluded from the overall score. The price is unknown, so value for money is not computed. How the rating works →