Infinix GT 30 vs Nokia XR30
The Infinix GT 30 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400, while the Nokia XR30 (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695. By overall MobileRank rating, the Infinix GT 30 leads — 58/100 vs 46/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Infinix GT 30 has the bigger battery (5500 mAh vs 4600); the Infinix GT 30 is faster in AnTuTu (906,794 vs 592,015).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Infinix GT 30
Nokia XR30
What makes Infinix GT 30 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 906794 vs 592015
- Better Geekbench Single: 1061 vs 905
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3185 vs 2101
- Bigger battery: 5500 vs 4600 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
- Higher performance (57/100 vs 46/100)
- Longer battery life (54/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (93/100 vs 66/100)
What makes Nokia XR30 better?
- Better camera (43/100 vs 42/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Infinix GT 30 vs the Nokia XR30, the Infinix GT 30 scores 12 points higher (58/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Infinix GT 30 leads (57/100 vs 46/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 30 leads (54/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the Infinix GT 30 is a bit better (57/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 30 notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (93/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 and the Infinix GT 30 are nearly equal (43/100 vs 42/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 30 notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (54/100 vs 37/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Infinix GT 30 | Nokia XR30 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 | |
| AnTuTu | 906794 | 592015 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1061 | 905 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3185 | 2101 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" | |
| Resolution | 1224x2720 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5500 mAh | 4600 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.7×75.8×8.0 mm | — | |
| Weight | 187 g | — | |
| Launch price | $230 | — |
Camera comparison
Infinix GT 30
- Main: 64MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Nokia XR30
- Main: 64MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Infinix GT 30
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2720
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Nokia XR30
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Infinix GT 30
- 5500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Nokia XR30
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Infinix GT 30 and Nokia XR30, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Infinix GT 30 leads Nokia XR30 by 53.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia XR30
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Infinix GT 30 is a bit better (57/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Infinix GT 30 notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (93/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Nokia XR30 and the Infinix GT 30 are nearly equal (43/100 vs 42/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Infinix GT 30 notably outperforms the Nokia XR30 (54/100 vs 37/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Infinix GT 30 or the Nokia XR30?
The Infinix GT 30 is noticeably better than the Nokia XR30 — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Infinix GT 30 and the Nokia XR30?
The Infinix GT 30 has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Nokia XR30 — 46/100.
Which is more powerful: the Infinix GT 30 or the Nokia XR30?
The Infinix GT 30 leads on performance (57/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the Infinix GT 30 over the Nokia XR30?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Infinix GT 30 (93/100 vs 66/100).