Nokia C31 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

The Nokia C31 (2022) runs on the Unisoc, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 10/100 (a 47-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5050); the main camera is 13 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C31 doesn't; the Nokia C31 is noticeably lighter (200g vs 309g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 by 47 points (57/100 vs 10/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia C31
Performance 0
Display 0
Camera 0
Battery 37
Design 50
Value for money 55
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Performance 67
Display 100
Camera 49
Battery 52
Design 0
Value for money 0
What makes Nokia C31 better?
  • Lighter: 200g vs 309g

  • Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better value for money (55/100 vs 0/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
  • Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5050 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP

  • Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (49/100 vs 0/100)
  • Longer battery life (52/100 vs 37/100)
  • Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia C31 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 47 points higher (57/100 vs 10/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (49/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 37/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nokia C31 leads (55/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 (49/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Nokia C31 (52/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Nokia C31 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nokia C31 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).

Nokia C31: The Nokia C31 is a better fit for everyday use.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold: The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Nokia C31 Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Processor Unisoc Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 2926532
Geekbench Single 3050
Geekbench Multi 9300
Display 6.8" IPS LCD 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 720x1600 2160x1584
Refresh rate 120 Hz
Battery 5050 mAh 5600 mAh
Charging 45W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
Main camera 13 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 5 MP 10 MP
RAM 3GB / 4GB 16GB
Storage 32GB / 64GB / 128GB 512GB
OS Android 12 Android 16 / One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP48
Dimensions 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm
Weight 200 g 309 g
Price $2899
Camera comparison
Nokia C31
  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 5MP
0
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
49
camera
Display comparison
Nokia C31
  • 6.8" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: —
0
display
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
  • 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2160x1584
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Nokia C31
  • 5050 mAh
  • No wireless charging
37
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
  • 5600 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
52
battery
Benchmarks
Price and availability
Nokia C31
Price unknown
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
$2899
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 (67/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 (100/100 vs 0/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 (49/100 vs 0/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Nokia C31 (52/100 vs 37/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Nokia C31 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (50/100 vs 0/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Nokia C31 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia C31 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia C31 by 47 points (57/100 vs 10/100).

What is the rating of the Nokia C31 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Nokia C31 has a MobileRank rating of 10/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nokia C31 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (49/100 vs 0/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nokia C31 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Nokia C31 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Nokia C31 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.