Nokia 2760 Flip vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Comparing the Nokia 2760 Flip (2022) and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 5/100 (a 52-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 1450); the main camera is 5 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia 2760 Flip doesn't; the Nokia 2760 Flip is thinner (11.5mm vs 12.9mm).
Nokia 2760 Flip
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (55/100 vs 0/100)
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 1450 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 5MP
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (49/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Nokia 2760 Flip vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 52 points higher (57/100 vs 5/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (49/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nokia 2760 Flip leads (55/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (49/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (52/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Nokia 2760 Flip significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Nokia 2760 Flip significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Nokia 2760 Flip | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | — | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 9300 | |
| Display | 2.8" TFT LCD | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 240x320 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 1450 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 5 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | — | 10 MP | |
| RAM | — | 16GB | |
| Storage | — | 512GB | |
| OS | Kai OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 202.1×58.0×11.5 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | — | 309 g | |
| Price | — | $2899 |
Nokia 2760 Flip
- Main: 5MP
- Front: —
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Nokia 2760 Flip
- 2.8" TFT LCD
- Resolution: 240x320
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia 2760 Flip
- 1450 mAh
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Nokia 2760 Flip
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (67/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (49/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip (52/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Nokia 2760 Flip significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (50/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Nokia 2760 Flip significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (55/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Nokia 2760 Flip or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Nokia 2760 Flip by 52 points (57/100 vs 5/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia 2760 Flip and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Nokia 2760 Flip has a MobileRank rating of 5/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia 2760 Flip or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (49/100 vs 0/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia 2760 Flip or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Nokia 2760 Flip over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Nokia 2760 Flip is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.