Nokia C02 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Nokia C02 (2023) runs on the Unisoc SC9832E, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 17/100 (a 70-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 5 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 153,667); the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C02 doesn't; the Nokia C02 is noticeably lighter (191g vs 226g).
Nokia C02
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 191g vs 226g
- Better portability (48/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 153667
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 205
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 846
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 3000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 5MP
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 9/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 42/100)
Comparing the Nokia C02 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 70 points higher (87/100 vs 17/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 15/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (93/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (84/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (81/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia C02 is a bit better (48/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Nokia C02 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc SC9832E | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 153667 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 205 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 846 | 9553 | |
| Display | 5.5" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1440 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 5 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 2 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12 (Go edition) | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 148.7×71.2×10.0 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 191 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Nokia C02
- Main: 5MP
- Front: 2MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Nokia C02
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Nokia C02
- 3000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Nokia C02 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Nokia C02 by 95.3% in our overall performance rating.
Nokia C02
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (93/100 vs 9/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (84/100 vs 42/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (81/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia C02 is a bit better (48/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Nokia C02 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 by 70 points (87/100 vs 17/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C02 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Nokia C02 has a MobileRank rating of 17/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C02 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Nokia C02 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 9/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C02 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Nokia C02 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.