Nokia C02 vs Vivo X300s
The Nokia C02 (2023) runs on the Unisoc SC9832E, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 22/100 (a 67-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 5 MP vs 200 MP; the Nokia C02 is noticeably lighter (191g vs 217g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia C02
Vivo X300s
What makes Nokia C02 better?
- Lighter: 191g vs 217g
- Better portability (48/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo X300s better?
- Bigger battery: 7100 vs 3000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 5MP
- Better camera (94/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 42/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Nokia C02 vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 67 points higher (89/100 vs 22/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 15/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (94/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (94/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (83/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia C02 is a bit better (48/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Nokia C02 | Vivo X300s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc SC9832E | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3703823 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 10243 | |
| Display | 5.5" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1440 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 7100 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| Main camera | 5 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 2 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12 (Go edition) | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| NFC | no | — | |
| Dimensions | 148.7×71.2×10.0 mm | — | |
| Weight | 191 g | 217 g | |
| Launch price | — | $723 |
Camera comparison
Nokia C02
- Main: 5MP
- Front: 2MP
Vivo X300s
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Nokia C02
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300s
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Nokia C02
- 3000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300s
- 7100 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia C02
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (94/100 vs 42/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (94/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (83/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Nokia C02 is a bit better (48/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia C02 or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 by 67 points (89/100 vs 22/100).
What is the rating of the Nokia C02 and the Vivo X300s?
The Nokia C02 has a MobileRank rating of 22/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Nokia C02 or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Nokia C02 over the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.