Nokia C02 vs Vivo X300s

The Nokia C02 (2023) runs on the Unisoc SC9832E, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 17/100 (a 72-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 5 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 153,667); the Nokia C02 is noticeably lighter (191g vs 217g).

The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 by 72 points (89/100 vs 17/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia C02
Performance 9
Display 42
Camera 10
Battery 15
Portability 48
Value for money
Vivo X300s
Performance 94
Display 94
Camera 94
Battery 83
Portability 42
Value for money 90
What makes Nokia C02 better?
  • Lighter: 191g vs 217g

  • Better portability (48/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo X300s better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 153667
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 205
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 846
  • Bigger battery: 7100 vs 3000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 5MP

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 9/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 15/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 42/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia C02 vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 72 points higher (89/100 vs 17/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 15/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (94/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (94/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (94/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (83/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Nokia C02 is a bit better (48/100 vs 42/100).

Nokia C02: The Nokia C02 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300s: The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Nokia C02 Vivo X300s
Processor Unisoc SC9832E Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 153667 3703823
Geekbench Single 205 3228
Geekbench Multi 846 9553
Display 5.5" IPS LCD 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 720x1440 2800x1260
Refresh rate 144 Hz
Battery 3000 mAh 7100 mAh
Charging 90W
Wireless charging 40W
Main camera 5 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 2 MP 50 MP
RAM 2GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 32GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12 (Go edition) Android 16 / OriginOS 6
NFC no
Dimensions 148.7×71.2×10.0 mm
Weight 191 g 217 g
Launch price $723
Camera comparison
Nokia C02
  • Main: 5MP
  • Front: 2MP
10
camera
Vivo X300s
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera
Display comparison
Nokia C02
  • 5.5" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1440
  • Refresh rate: —
42
display
Vivo X300s
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display
Battery and charging
Nokia C02
  • 3000 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
15
battery
Vivo X300s
  • 7100 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
83
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nokia C02 and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nokia C02 Unisoc SC9832E
17/100
153667 AnTuTu
Vivo X300s Dimensity 9500
89/100 +95.9%
3703823 AnTuTu

Vivo X300s leads Nokia C02 by 95.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia C02
Price unknown
Vivo X300s
$723
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (94/100 vs 9/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (94/100 vs 42/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (94/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (83/100 vs 15/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Nokia C02 is a bit better (48/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia C02 or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 by 72 points (89/100 vs 17/100).

What is the rating of the Nokia C02 and the Vivo X300s?

The Nokia C02 has a MobileRank rating of 17/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nokia C02 or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on camera score (94/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nokia C02 or the Vivo X300s?

The Vivo X300s leads on performance (94/100 vs 9/100).

Should you choose the Nokia C02 over the Vivo X300s?

The Nokia C02 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.