Nokia C02 vs Vivo X Fold6

The Nokia C02 (2023) runs on the Unisoc SC9832E, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 17/100 (a 71-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold6 has the bigger battery (6900 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 5 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X Fold6 is faster in AnTuTu (3,485,039 vs 153,667); the Vivo X Fold6 has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C02 doesn't; the Vivo X Fold6 is thinner (4.3mm vs 10.0mm).

The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 by 71 points (88/100 vs 17/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia C02
Performance 9
Display 42
Camera 10
Battery 15
Portability 48
Value for money
Vivo X Fold6
Performance 94
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 82
Portability 100
Value for money 80
What makes Nokia C02 better?

  • Overall rating 17/100
What makes Vivo X Fold6 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3485039 vs 153667
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 205
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 846
  • Bigger battery: 6900 vs 3000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 5MP

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 9/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (82/100 vs 15/100)
  • Better display (81/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better portability (100/100 vs 48/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia C02 vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 71 points higher (88/100 vs 17/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (94/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (87/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 15/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (94/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (81/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (87/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (82/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (100/100 vs 48/100).

Nokia C02: The Nokia C02 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X Fold6: The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Nokia C02 Vivo X Fold6
Processor Unisoc SC9832E MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 153667 3485039
Geekbench Single 205 3228
Geekbench Multi 846 9553
Display 5.5" IPS LCD 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 720x1440 2480x2200
Refresh rate 120 Hz
Battery 3000 mAh 6900 mAh
Charging 80W
Wireless charging 50W
Main camera 5 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 2 MP 20 MP
RAM 2GB 16GB
Storage 32GB 512GB
OS Android 12 (Go edition) Android 15
Brightness (peak) 5500 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 148.7×71.2×10.0 mm 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm
Weight 191 g
Launch price $1900
Camera comparison
Nokia C02
  • Main: 5MP
  • Front: 2MP
10
camera
Vivo X Fold6
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.75
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
87
camera
Display comparison
Nokia C02
  • 5.5" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1440
  • Refresh rate: —
42
display
Vivo X Fold6
  • 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display
Battery and charging
Nokia C02
  • 3000 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
15
battery
Vivo X Fold6
  • 6900 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
82
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nokia C02 and Vivo X Fold6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nokia C02 Unisoc SC9832E
17/100
153667 AnTuTu
Vivo X Fold6 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
88/100 +95.6%
3485039 AnTuTu

Vivo X Fold6 leads Nokia C02 by 95.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia C02
Price unknown
Vivo X Fold6
$1900
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (94/100 vs 9/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (81/100 vs 42/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (87/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (82/100 vs 15/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (100/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia C02 or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 by 71 points (88/100 vs 17/100).

What is the rating of the Nokia C02 and the Vivo X Fold6?

The Nokia C02 has a MobileRank rating of 17/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nokia C02 or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nokia C02 or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on performance (94/100 vs 9/100).

Should you choose the Nokia C02 over the Vivo X Fold6?

The Nokia C02 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.