Nokia C02 vs Vivo iQOO 13

The Nokia C02 (2023) runs on the Unisoc SC9832E, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 17/100 (a 67-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 5 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO 13 is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 153,667); the Vivo iQOO 13 has NFC for contactless payments, the Nokia C02 doesn't; the Nokia C02 is noticeably lighter (191g vs 207g).

The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 by 67 points (84/100 vs 17/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Nokia C02
Performance 9
Display 42
Camera 10
Battery 15
Portability 48
Value for money
Vivo iQOO 13
Performance 92
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 73
Portability 55
Value for money 80
What makes Nokia C02 better?
  • Lighter: 191g vs 207g

  • Overall rating 17/100
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 153667
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 205
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 846
  • Bigger battery: 6150 vs 3000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 5MP

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 9/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (73/100 vs 15/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better portability (55/100 vs 48/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Nokia C02 vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 67 points higher (84/100 vs 17/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (92/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (78/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 15/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (92/100 vs 9/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (99/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (78/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (73/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (55/100 vs 48/100).

Nokia C02: The Nokia C02 is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo iQOO 13: The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Nokia C02 Vivo iQOO 13
Processor Unisoc SC9832E Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 153667 3119308
Geekbench Single 205 3041
Geekbench Multi 846 9494
Display 5.5" IPS LCD 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 720x1440 1440x3168
Refresh rate 144 Hz
Battery 3000 mAh 6150 mAh
Charging 120W
Main camera 5 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 2 MP 32 MP
RAM 2GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 32GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12 (Go edition) Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China)
NFC no yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 148.7×71.2×10.0 mm 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm
Weight 191 g 207 g
Launch price $650
Camera comparison
Nokia C02
  • Main: 5MP
  • Front: 2MP
10
camera
Vivo iQOO 13
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Display comparison
Nokia C02
  • 5.5" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1440
  • Refresh rate: —
42
display
Vivo iQOO 13
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Battery and charging
Nokia C02
  • 3000 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
15
battery
Vivo iQOO 13
  • 6150 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
73
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Nokia C02 and Vivo iQOO 13, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Nokia C02 Unisoc SC9832E
17/100
153667 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 13 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
84/100 +95.1%
3119308 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 13 leads Nokia C02 by 95.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Nokia C02
Price unknown
Vivo iQOO 13
$650
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (92/100 vs 9/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (99/100 vs 42/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (78/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 (73/100 vs 15/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 is a bit better (55/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Nokia C02 or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Nokia C02 by 67 points (84/100 vs 17/100).

What is the rating of the Nokia C02 and the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Nokia C02 has a MobileRank rating of 17/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.

Which has the better camera: the Nokia C02 or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Nokia C02 or the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (92/100 vs 9/100).

Should you choose the Nokia C02 over the Vivo iQOO 13?

The Nokia C02 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.