Tecno Spark 50 5G vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Tecno Spark 50 5G (2026) runs on the Dimensity 6300, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $179 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 47/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 6500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 524,785); the Tecno Spark 50 5G is noticeably lighter (195g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G by 40 points (87/100 vs 47/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Spark 50 5G
Performance 43
Display 55
Camera 30
Battery 69
Portability 64
Value for money 62
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Tecno Spark 50 5G better?
  • Lighter: 195g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $179 vs $899

  • Better portability (64/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 524785
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 771
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 1980
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 6500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 69/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better value for money (86/100 vs 62/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Tecno Spark 50 5G vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 40 points higher (87/100 vs 47/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 69/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (86/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G (93/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G (84/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G (96/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 69/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark 50 5G notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (64/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G (86/100 vs 62/100).

Tecno Spark 50 5G: The Tecno Spark 50 5G is a better fit for everyday use.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Tecno Spark 50 5G Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Dimensity 6300 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 524785 3269794
Geekbench Single 771 3228
Geekbench Multi 1980 9553
Display 6.8" IPS LCD 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 720x1600 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6500 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 45W 90W
Wireless charging 40W
DXOMark (camera) 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits
NFC yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 195 g 226 g
Launch price $179 $899
Camera comparison
Tecno Spark 50 5G
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Tecno Spark 50 5G
  • 6.8" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
55
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Tecno Spark 50 5G
  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless charging: no data
69
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Tecno Spark 50 5G and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Tecno Spark 50 5G Dimensity 6300
47/100
524785 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +84.0%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Tecno Spark 50 5G by 84.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Spark 50 5G
$179
Vivo X300 Pro
$899

Launch price difference: $720. Tecno Spark 50 5G was $720 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G (93/100 vs 43/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G (84/100 vs 55/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G (96/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 69/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Spark 50 5G notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (64/100 vs 43/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G (86/100 vs 62/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Spark 50 5G or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Spark 50 5G by 40 points (87/100 vs 47/100).

What is the rating of the Tecno Spark 50 5G and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Tecno Spark 50 5G has a MobileRank rating of 47/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Tecno Spark 50 5G or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Tecno Spark 50 5G or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 43/100).

Should you choose the Tecno Spark 50 5G over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Tecno Spark 50 5G is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.