Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2400; launch prices were $1499 and $849. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 59/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 1,841,283).
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 1841283
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 2085
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 6507
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 30W vs 15W
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 78/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 35/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 31/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 82/100)
- Lighter: 187g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $849 vs $1499
- Better portability (78/100 vs 68/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 19 points higher (78/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (93/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (60/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (64/100 vs 31/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 62/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE — 30/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (93/100 vs 78/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (60/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (64/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE is a bit better (78/100 vs 68/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 2400 | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 1841283 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 2085 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 6507 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 2640x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 165.1×71.9×6.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 187 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $849 |
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
- 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2640x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE by 83.5% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $650. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE was $650 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (93/100 vs 78/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (60/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (64/100 vs 31/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE is a bit better (78/100 vs 68/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE — 59/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (93/100 vs 78/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE is a better fit for active users.