Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2400; launch prices were $1799 and $849. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 86/100 vs 59/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 1,841,283); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE is noticeably lighter (187g vs 285g).
Motorola Razr Fold
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 1841283
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 2085
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 6507
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 78/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 35/100)
- Longer battery life (71/100 vs 31/100)
- Lighter: 187g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $849 vs $1799
- Better display (82/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (78/100 vs 52/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 27 points higher (86/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (98/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (71/100 vs 31/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 76/100, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE — 30/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (98/100 vs 78/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (82/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (91/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (71/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (78/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Samsung Exynos 2400 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 1841283 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 2085 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 6507 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 2640x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 165.1×71.9×6.9 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 187 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $849 |
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 10MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
- 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2640x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE by 114.1% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $950. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE was $950 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (98/100 vs 78/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (82/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (91/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE (71/100 vs 31/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (78/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE by 27 points (86/100 vs 59/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE — 59/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (98/100 vs 78/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7 FE is a better fit for active users.