Motorola Razr Fold vs Vivo Y78 (China)
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo Y78 (China) (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7020. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 86/100 vs 47/100 (a 39-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 639,509); the Motorola Razr Fold has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y78 (China) doesn't; the Vivo Y78 (China) is noticeably lighter (190g vs 285g).
Motorola Razr Fold
Vivo Y78 (China)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 639509
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 912
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2244
- Faster charging: 80W vs 44W
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 48/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (71/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 66/100)
- Lighter: 190g vs 285g
- Better portability (65/100 vs 52/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Vivo Y78 (China), the Motorola Razr Fold scores 39 points higher (86/100 vs 47/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (98/100 vs 48/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (71/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y78 (China) (98/100 vs 48/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Vivo Y78 (China) (81/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y78 (China) (91/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Vivo Y78 (China) (71/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y78 (China) is a bit better (65/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Vivo Y78 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 7020 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 639509 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 912 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 2244 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 1080x2388 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 44W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IPX9 | — | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 164.1×76.2×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 190 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | — |
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo Y78 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y78 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo Y78 (China)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Vivo Y78 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Vivo Y78 (China) by 516.6% in our overall performance rating.
Vivo Y78 (China)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y78 (China) (98/100 vs 48/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Vivo Y78 (China) (81/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y78 (China) (91/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Vivo Y78 (China) (71/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y78 (China) is a bit better (65/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo Y78 (China)?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y78 (China) by 39 points (86/100 vs 47/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Vivo Y78 (China)?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 86/100, the Vivo Y78 (China) — 47/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo Y78 (China)?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Vivo Y78 (China)?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (98/100 vs 48/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Vivo Y78 (China)?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y78 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.