Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Vivo Y78 (China)
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo Y78 (China) (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7020. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 47/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y78 (China) has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,962,094 vs 644,203); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y78 (China) doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Vivo Y78 (China)
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2962094 vs 644203
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 912
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2244
- Faster charging: 68W vs 44W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 48/100)
- Better camera (57/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 65/100)
What makes Vivo Y78 (China) better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
- Lighter: 190g vs 199g
- Overall rating 47/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Vivo Y78 (China), the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 29 points higher (76/100 vs 47/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 48/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y78 (China) (91/100 vs 48/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y78 (China) (94/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y78 (China) (57/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Vivo Y78 (China) are nearly equal (68/100 vs 65/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo Y78 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 7020 | |
| AnTuTu | 2962094 | 644203 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 912 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 2244 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 1080x2388 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 44W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 164.1×76.2×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 190 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | — |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo Y78 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo Y78 (China)
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo Y78 (China)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Vivo Y78 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Vivo Y78 (China) by 359.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y78 (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y78 (China) (91/100 vs 48/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y78 (China) (94/100 vs 66/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y78 (China) (57/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Vivo Y78 (China) are nearly equal (68/100 vs 65/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo Y78 (China)?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y78 (China) by 29 points (76/100 vs 47/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Vivo Y78 (China)?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Vivo Y78 (China) — 47/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo Y78 (China)?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo Y78 (China)?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 48/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Vivo Y78 (China)?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.