Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy A03s
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Samsung Galaxy A03s (2021) runs on the MediaTek Helio P35; estimated prices are $1799 and $130. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 77/100 vs 13/100 (a 64-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 199,111); the Motorola Razr Fold has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A03s doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy A03s is noticeably lighter (196g vs 285g).
Motorola Razr Fold
Samsung Galaxy A03s
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 199111
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 476
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 828
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 60Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Lighter: 196g vs 285g
- Cheaper: $130 vs $1799
- Better design/ergonomics (55/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Samsung Galaxy A03s, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 64 points higher (77/100 vs 13/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (92/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (51/100 vs 36/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03s leads (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (92/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (91/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (51/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03s significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (55/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03s significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (100/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Samsung Galaxy A03s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Helio P35 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 199111 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 476 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 828 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 60 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 2GB / 3GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | — | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IPX9 | — | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 164.2×75.9×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 196 g | |
| Price | $1799 | $130 |
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy A03s
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A03s
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Samsung Galaxy A03s
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Samsung Galaxy A03s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Samsung Galaxy A03s by 1880.3% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1669. Samsung Galaxy A03s is cheaper by $1669.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (92/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (91/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s (51/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03s significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (55/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A03s significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (100/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy A03s?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A03s by 64 points (77/100 vs 13/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Samsung Galaxy A03s?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Samsung Galaxy A03s — 13/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy A03s?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 0/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Samsung Galaxy A03s?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (92/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Samsung Galaxy A03s?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Samsung Galaxy A03s is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.