Motorola Razr 70 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Motorola Razr 70 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400X, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $699 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 60/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 956,756); the Motorola Razr 70 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 230g).
Motorola Razr 70
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Lighter: 188g vs 230g
- Cheaper: $699 vs $950
- Better portability (74/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 956756
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3185
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 57/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 49/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 81/100)
- Better value for money (94/100 vs 32/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 31 points higher (91/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 49/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (94/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 (99/100 vs 57/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 (96/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 (85/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (74/100 vs 39/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 (94/100 vs 32/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 70 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7400X | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 956756 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1061 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3185 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2640x1080 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 171.3×74.0×7.3 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 230 g | |
| Price | $699 | $950 |
Motorola Razr 70
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Razr 70
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2640x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 70
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Motorola Razr 70 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Motorola Razr 70 by 77.5% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $251. Motorola Razr 70 is cheaper by $251.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 (99/100 vs 57/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 (96/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 (85/100 vs 49/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (74/100 vs 39/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 (94/100 vs 32/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70 by 31 points (91/100 vs 60/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 70 has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 57/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 57/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 70 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.