Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A37
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy A37 (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1480; launch prices were $1099 and $250. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads — 77/100 vs 54/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,126,402 vs 1,021,736).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy A37
What makes Motorola Razr 70 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3126402 vs 1021736
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1137
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3437
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 60/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (61/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 79/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A37 better?
- Lighter: 196g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $250 vs $1099
- Overall rating 54/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy A37, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra scores 23 points higher (77/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (60/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads (61/100 vs 48/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 70 Ultra — 64/100, Samsung Galaxy A37 — 58/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (91/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (95/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (60/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (61/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 68/100.
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 70 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A37 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 1480 | |
| AnTuTu | 3126402 | 1021736 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1137 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 3437 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 2340x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 6GB / 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16, One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 1900 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 162.9×78.2×7.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 196 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $250 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy A37
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 12MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A37
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 15W
Samsung Galaxy A37
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy A37, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A37 by 206.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $849. Samsung Galaxy A37 was $849 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (91/100 vs 60/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (95/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (60/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a bit better (61/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, both devices are on the same level — 68/100.
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A37?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 by 23 points (77/100 vs 54/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy A37?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 77/100, the Samsung Galaxy A37 — 54/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A37?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on camera score (60/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A37?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy A37?
The Motorola Razr 70 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy A37 is a better fit for active users.