Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Samsung Galaxy A37
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy A37 (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1480; launch prices were $1499 and $250. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 53/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 1,031,048); the Samsung Galaxy A37 is noticeably lighter (180g vs 199g).
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Samsung Galaxy A37
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 1031048
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1140
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 3346
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 60/100)
- Better camera (60/100 vs 34/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 48/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 68/100)
- Lighter: 180g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $250 vs $1499
- Better portability (78/100 vs 68/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Samsung Galaxy A37, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 25 points higher (78/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (93/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (60/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (64/100 vs 48/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 62/100, Samsung Galaxy A37 — 58/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (93/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (95/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (60/100 vs 34/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (64/100 vs 48/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A37 is a bit better (78/100 vs 68/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Samsung Galaxy A37 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Samsung Exynos 1480 | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 1031048 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 1140 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 3346 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.5" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 2340x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 1900 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 162.9×78.2×7.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 180 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $250 |
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy A37
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 13MP
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A37
- 6.5" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy A37
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Samsung Galaxy A37, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Samsung Galaxy A37 by 227.8% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $1249. Samsung Galaxy A37 was $1249 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (93/100 vs 60/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (95/100 vs 68/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (60/100 vs 34/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 (64/100 vs 48/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A37 is a bit better (78/100 vs 68/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy A37?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A37 by 25 points (78/100 vs 53/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Samsung Galaxy A37?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Samsung Galaxy A37 — 53/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy A37?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 34/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Samsung Galaxy A37?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (93/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Samsung Galaxy A37?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy A37 is a better fit for active users.