Motorola Razr 70+ vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Motorola Razr 70+ (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $1099 and $10498. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 67/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,801,694); the Motorola Razr 70+ is noticeably lighter (189g vs 230g).
Motorola Razr 70+
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 189g vs 230g
- Cheaper: $1099 vs $10498
- Better display (91/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (75/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1801694
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1930
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 4817
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 75/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 46/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 70+ vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 24 points higher (91/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70+ (99/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70+ and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (91/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70+ (96/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70+ (85/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70+ significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (75/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 70+ | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1801694 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1930 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4817 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1084x2640 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 171.4×74.0×7.1 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 230 g | |
| Price | $1099 | $10498 |
Motorola Razr 70+
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Razr 70+
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1084x2640
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 70+
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Motorola Razr 70+ and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Motorola Razr 70+ by 57.6% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $9399. Motorola Razr 70+ is cheaper by $9399.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70+ (99/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70+ and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (91/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70+ (96/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70+ (85/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70+ significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (75/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70+ by 24 points (91/100 vs 67/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70+ and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 70+ has a MobileRank rating of 67/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 57/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70+ over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 70+ is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.