Motorola Razr 70+ vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Motorola Razr 70+ (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1099 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 67/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,797,821); the Motorola Razr 70+ is noticeably lighter (189g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 70+
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Motorola Razr 70+ better?
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 189g vs 230g
- Better display (91/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (75/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1797821
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1923
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 5179
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Cheaper at launch: $950 vs $1099
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 75/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 46/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 70+ vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 24 points higher (91/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 70+ — 44/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70+ (99/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70+ and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (91/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70+ (96/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70+ (85/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70+ significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (75/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 70+ | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1797821 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1923 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5179 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1084x2640 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 171.4×74.0×7.1 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 70+
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 70+
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1084x2640
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 70+
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 70+ and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Motorola Razr 70+ by 57.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $149. Vivo X300 Ultra was $149 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 70+ (99/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 70+ and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (91/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70+ (96/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70+ (85/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 70+ significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (75/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 70+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 70+ by 24 points (91/100 vs 67/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 70+ and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 70+ has a MobileRank rating of 67/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 70+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 57/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 70+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 70+ over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 70+ is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.