Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Vivo Y500
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo Y500 (2026) runs on the Unisoc T7300; launch prices were $1099 and $345. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 56/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y500 has the bigger battery (8100 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y500 doesn't.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Vivo Y500
- Faster charging: 68W vs 44W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 210g
- Better camera (57/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 51/100)
- Bigger battery: 8100 vs 4700 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $345 vs $1099
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 58/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Vivo Y500, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 20 points higher (76/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 37/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 64/100, Vivo Y500 — 52/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y500 (57/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y500 is a bit better (64/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y500 (68/100 vs 51/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo Y500 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | Unisoc T7300 | |
| AnTuTu | 3113462 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | — | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 8100 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 44W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 5000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 163.7×76.2×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 210 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $345 |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo Y500
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo Y500
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo Y500
- 8100 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Launch price difference: $754. Vivo Y500 was $754 cheaper at launch.
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y500 (57/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y500 is a bit better (64/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo Y500 (68/100 vs 51/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo Y500?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo Y500 by 20 points (76/100 vs 56/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Vivo Y500?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Vivo Y500 — 56/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo Y500?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 37/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Vivo Y500?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo Y500 is a better fit for everyday use.