Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Vivo Y500
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo Y500 (2026) runs on the Unisoc T7300; launch prices were $1499 and $345. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 56/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y500 has the bigger battery (8100 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y500 doesn't.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Vivo Y500
- Faster charging: 68W vs 44W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 210g
- Better camera (60/100 vs 37/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 51/100)
- Bigger battery: 8100 vs 5000 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $345 vs $1499
- Overall rating 56/100
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Vivo Y500, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 22 points higher (78/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (60/100 vs 37/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 62/100, Vivo Y500 — 52/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Vivo Y500 (60/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 64/100. In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Vivo Y500 (68/100 vs 51/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Vivo Y500 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Unisoc T7300 | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | — | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8100 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 44W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 5000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 163.7×76.2×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 210 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $345 |
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo Y500
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo Y500
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo Y500
- 8100 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
Launch price difference: $1154. Vivo Y500 was $1154 cheaper at launch.
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (95/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Vivo Y500 (60/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 64/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Vivo Y500 (68/100 vs 51/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Vivo Y500?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 significantly outperforms the Vivo Y500 by 22 points (78/100 vs 56/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Vivo Y500?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Vivo Y500 — 56/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Vivo Y500?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on camera score (60/100 vs 37/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Vivo Y500?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo Y500 is a better fit for everyday use.