Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Vivo X Fold6
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $1099 and $1900. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 76/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold6 has the bigger battery (6900 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X Fold6 is faster in AnTuTu (3,455,738 vs 2,962,094); the Vivo X Fold6 is thinner (4.3mm vs 7.2mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Vivo X Fold6
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Cheaper at launch: $1099 vs $1900
- Better display (94/100 vs 81/100)
What makes Vivo X Fold6 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3455738 vs 2962094
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 9287
- Bigger battery: 6900 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 68W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 30W
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 91/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (82/100 vs 58/100)
- Better portability (100/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 12 points higher (88/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (87/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 62/100, Vivo X Fold6 — 84/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (95/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (87/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (82/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (100/100 vs 68/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo X Fold6 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 2962094 | 3455738 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 10243 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 8.0" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 6900 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 5500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | — | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $1900 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X Fold6
- Main: 200MP f/1.75
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo X Fold6
- 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo X Fold6
- 6900 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Vivo X Fold6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X Fold6 leads Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by 14.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $801. Motorola Razr 60 Ultra was $801 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (95/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (87/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (82/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (100/100 vs 68/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Vivo X Fold6?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 57/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Vivo X Fold6?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.