Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Vivo X Fold6

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $1099 and $1900. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 76/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold6 has the bigger battery (6900 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X Fold6 is faster in AnTuTu (3,485,039 vs 3,113,462); the Vivo X Fold6 is thinner (4.3mm vs 7.2mm).

The Vivo X Fold6 is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Performance 92
Display 94
Camera 57
Battery 58
Portability 68
Value for money 64
Vivo X Fold6
Performance 94
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 82
Portability 100
Value for money 80
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
  • Cheaper: $1099 vs $1900

  • Better display (94/100 vs 81/100)
What makes Vivo X Fold6 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3485039 vs 3113462
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 3041
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 9494
  • Bigger battery: 6900 vs 4700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 68W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 30W

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 92/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 57/100)
  • Longer battery life (82/100 vs 58/100)
  • Better portability (100/100 vs 68/100)
  • Better value for money (80/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 12 points higher (88/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (87/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 58/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (80/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (94/100 vs 92/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (87/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (82/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (100/100 vs 68/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (80/100 vs 64/100).

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra: The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo X Fold6: The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Vivo X Fold6
Processor Snapdragon 8 Elite MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 3113462 3485039
Geekbench Single 3041 3228
Geekbench Multi 9494 9553
Display 7.0" pOLED 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1224x2912 2480x2200
Refresh rate 165 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 6900 mAh
Charging 68W 80W
Wireless charging 30W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 32 MP 20 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 512GB
OS Android 15 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 5500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm
Weight 199 g
Price $1099 $1900
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
57
camera
Vivo X Fold6
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.75
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
87
camera
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • 7.0" pOLED
  • Resolution: 1224x2912
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
94
display
Vivo X Fold6
  • 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 68W
  • Wireless: 30W
58
battery
Vivo X Fold6
  • 6900 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
82
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Vivo X Fold6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Motorola Razr 60 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite
76/100
3113462 AnTuTu
Vivo X Fold6 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
88/100 +10.7%
3485039 AnTuTu

Vivo X Fold6 leads Motorola Razr 60 Ultra by 10.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
$1099
Vivo X Fold6
$1900

Price difference: $801. Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is cheaper by $801.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (94/100 vs 92/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (87/100 vs 57/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (82/100 vs 58/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (100/100 vs 68/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (80/100 vs 64/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 is noticeably better than the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 12 points.

What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Vivo X Fold6?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 57/100).

Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Vivo X Fold6?

The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.