Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Vivo X90 Pro
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X90 Pro (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9200; estimated prices are $1099 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 65/100 (a 11-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X90 Pro has the bigger battery (4870 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 3 MP; the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 1,755,232); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably lighter (199g vs 214g).
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Vivo X90 Pro
- Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 1755232
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1745
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 4351
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 3MP
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 214g
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 73/100)
- Better camera (57/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 36/100)
- Better value for money (64/100 vs 42/100)
- Bigger battery: 4870 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 68W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 30W
- Cheaper: $799 vs $1099
- Longer battery life (77/100 vs 58/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Vivo X90 Pro, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 11 points higher (76/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X90 Pro leads (77/100 vs 58/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (64/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X90 Pro (92/100 vs 73/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (57/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X90 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (77/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo X90 Pro (68/100 vs 36/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X90 Pro (64/100 vs 42/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Vivo X90 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9200 | |
| AnTuTu | 3113462 | 1755232 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 1745 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 4351 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 4870 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 3 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 (Global), Origin OS 3 (China) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 164.1×74.5×9.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 214 g | |
| Price | $1099 | $799 |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X90 Pro
- Main: 3MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo X90 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo X90 Pro
- 4870 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Vivo X90 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Vivo X90 Pro by 77.4% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $300. Vivo X90 Pro is cheaper by $300.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X90 Pro (92/100 vs 73/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (57/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X90 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (77/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo X90 Pro (68/100 vs 36/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X90 Pro (64/100 vs 42/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo X90 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably better than the Vivo X90 Pro — the overall rating gap is 11 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Vivo X90 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Vivo X90 Pro — 65/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo X90 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 43/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Vivo X90 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 73/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Vivo X90 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X90 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life.