Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate; estimated prices are $1099 and $249. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 57/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 1,030,590); the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is noticeably lighter (178g vs 199g).
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 1030590
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 3185
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (57/100 vs 40/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 82/100)
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 4700 mAh
- Lighter: 178g vs 199g
- Cheaper: $249 vs $1099
- Better portability (74/100 vs 68/100)
- Better value for money (68/100 vs 64/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 19 points higher (76/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 40/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (92/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (57/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 58/100. In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a bit better (74/100 vs 68/100). In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (68/100 vs 64/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 3113462 | 1030590 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 1061 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 3185 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 1208x2644 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 162.4×77.0×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 178 g | |
| Price | $1099 | $249 |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 202.1% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $850. Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is cheaper by $850.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (92/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (57/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 58/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a bit better (74/100 vs 68/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (68/100 vs 64/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a better fit for everyday use.