Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate; launch prices were $1099 and $249. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 63/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,962,094 vs 971,081); the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is noticeably lighter (178g vs 199g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2962094 vs 971081
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3185
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 82/100)
What makes Tecno Camon 50 Ultra better?
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 4700 mAh
- Lighter: 178g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $249 vs $1099
- Better camera (61/100 vs 57/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 13 points higher (76/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 62/100, Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — 76/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (91/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (61/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 58/100. In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a bit better (74/100 vs 68/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 2962094 | 971081 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1061 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 3185 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 1208x2644 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 162.4×77.0×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 178 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $249 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 205.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $850. Tecno Camon 50 Ultra was $850 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (91/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (61/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 58/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a bit better (74/100 vs 68/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — 63/100.
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.