Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Tecno Camon 40 Premier
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350; launch prices were $1099 and $450. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 73/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 40 Premier has the bigger battery (5100 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (2,962,094 vs 1,724,757).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
What makes Motorola Razr 60 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2962094 vs 1724757
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1398
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 4313
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 70/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 56/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 66/100)
What makes Tecno Camon 40 Premier better?
- Bigger battery: 5100 vs 4700 mAh
- Faster charging: 70W vs 68W
- Lighter: 193g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $450 vs $1099
- Better camera (81/100 vs 57/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Tecno Camon 40 Premier, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 3 points higher (76/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads (81/100 vs 57/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 62/100, Tecno Camon 40 Premier — 70/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (91/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 94/100. In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (81/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Tecno Camon 40 Premier are nearly equal (58/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Tecno Camon 40 Premier are nearly equal (68/100 vs 66/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Tecno Camon 40 Premier | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | |
| AnTuTu | 2962094 | 1724757 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1398 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 4313 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.7" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5100 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 70W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 161.0×75.0×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 193 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $450 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Tecno Camon 40 Premier, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Tecno Camon 40 Premier by 71.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $649. Tecno Camon 40 Premier was $649 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (91/100 vs 70/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 94/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (81/100 vs 57/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Tecno Camon 40 Premier are nearly equal (58/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Tecno Camon 40 Premier are nearly equal (68/100 vs 66/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra edges out the Tecno Camon 40 Premier by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier — 73/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads on camera score (81/100 vs 57/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (91/100 vs 70/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.