Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs Tecno Camon 40 Premier
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350; launch prices were $1499 and $450. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads — 78/100 vs 73/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 40 Premier has the bigger battery (5100 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is faster in AnTuTu (3,379,591 vs 1,724,757).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
What makes Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3379591 vs 1724757
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1398
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 4313
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 70/100)
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 94/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 66/100)
What makes Tecno Camon 40 Premier better?
- Bigger battery: 5100 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 70W vs 68W
- Lighter: 193g vs 199g
- Cheaper at launch: $450 vs $1499
- Better camera (81/100 vs 60/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 vs the Tecno Camon 40 Premier, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 scores 5 points higher (78/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads (92/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads (81/100 vs 60/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 — 66/100, Tecno Camon 40 Premier — 70/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (92/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Tecno Camon 40 Premier are nearly equal (95/100 vs 94/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (81/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Tecno Camon 40 Premier are nearly equal (68/100 vs 66/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 | Tecno Camon 40 Premier | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | |
| AnTuTu | 3379591 | 1724757 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1398 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 4313 | |
| Display | 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2992 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5100 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 70W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 161.0×75.0×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 193 g | |
| Launch price | $1499 | $450 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 7.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2992
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and Tecno Camon 40 Premier, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads Tecno Camon 40 Premier by 95.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1049. Tecno Camon 40 Premier was $1049 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (92/100 vs 70/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Tecno Camon 40 Premier are nearly equal (95/100 vs 94/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 (81/100 vs 60/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a bit better (64/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Tecno Camon 40 Premier are nearly equal (68/100 vs 66/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 edges out the Tecno Camon 40 Premier by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 and the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier — 73/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads on camera score (81/100 vs 60/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 or the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 leads on performance (92/100 vs 70/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 over the Tecno Camon 40 Premier?
The Motorola Razr Ultra 2026 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.