Oppo F29 Pro vs OPPO Reno16 FS
The Oppo F29 Pro (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy, while the OPPO Reno16 FS (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 FS leads — 61/100 vs 55/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 FS has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 6000); the OPPO Reno16 FS has NFC for contactless payments, the Oppo F29 Pro doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oppo F29 Pro
OPPO Reno16 FS
What makes Oppo F29 Pro better?
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Lighter: 180g vs 194g
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 58/100)
- Better portability (76/100 vs 58/100)
What makes OPPO Reno16 FS better?
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 6000 mAh
- Better camera (64/100 vs 32/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Oppo F29 Pro vs the OPPO Reno16 FS, the OPPO Reno16 FS scores 6 points higher (61/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 FS leads (64/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 80/100. In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 FS significantly outperforms the Oppo F29 Pro (64/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo F29 Pro is a bit better (63/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo F29 Pro notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 FS (76/100 vs 58/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Oppo F29 Pro | OPPO Reno16 FS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | |
| AnTuTu | 879714 | 879714 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 2813 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 1080x2372 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15, ColorOS 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | 1400 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68/IP69K | |
| Dimensions | 161.5×74.9×7.6 mm | 158.2×74.9×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 180 g | 194 g | |
| Launch price | — | $549 |
Camera comparison
Oppo F29 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
OPPO Reno16 FS
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Oppo F29 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno16 FS
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Oppo F29 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
OPPO Reno16 FS
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Oppo F29 Pro and OPPO Reno16 FS, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Oppo F29 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 80/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 FS significantly outperforms the Oppo F29 Pro (64/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo F29 Pro is a bit better (63/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo F29 Pro notably outperforms the OPPO Reno16 FS (76/100 vs 58/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oppo F29 Pro or the OPPO Reno16 FS?
The OPPO Reno16 FS edges out the Oppo F29 Pro by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo F29 Pro and the OPPO Reno16 FS?
The Oppo F29 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 55/100, the OPPO Reno16 FS — 61/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo F29 Pro or the OPPO Reno16 FS?
The OPPO Reno16 FS leads on camera score (64/100 vs 32/100).
Should you choose the Oppo F29 Pro over the OPPO Reno16 FS?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is camera — better on the OPPO Reno16 FS (64/100 vs 32/100).