Oppo Reno12 vs Oppo Reno16 FS
The Oppo Reno12 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy, while the Oppo Reno16 FS (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo Reno16 FS leads — 61/100 vs 56/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo Reno16 FS has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5000); the Oppo Reno12 is noticeably lighter (177g vs 194g).
Oppo Reno12
Oppo Reno16 FS
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Lighter: 177g vs 194g
- Better portability (77/100 vs 58/100)
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
- Better camera (64/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 56/100)
Comparing the Oppo Reno12 vs the Oppo Reno16 FS, the Oppo Reno16 FS scores 5 points higher (61/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno16 FS leads (64/100 vs 40/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 80/100. In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno16 FS notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 (64/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno16 FS and the Oppo Reno12 are nearly equal (58/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno12 notably outperforms the Oppo Reno16 FS (77/100 vs 58/100).
| Specification | Oppo Reno12 | Oppo Reno16 FS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Energy | |
| AnTuTu | 877641 | 877641 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 2813 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 1080x2372 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14.1 | Android 16, ColorOS 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | 1400 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.4×74.1×7.6 mm | 158.2×74.9×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 177 g | 194 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Oppo Reno12
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Oppo Reno16 FS
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Oppo Reno12
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo Reno16 FS
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2372
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Oppo Reno12
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Oppo Reno16 FS
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
We compared Oppo Reno12 and Oppo Reno16 FS, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 80/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno16 FS notably outperforms the Oppo Reno12 (64/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno16 FS and the Oppo Reno12 are nearly equal (58/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno12 notably outperforms the Oppo Reno16 FS (77/100 vs 58/100).
Which is better: the Oppo Reno12 or the Oppo Reno16 FS?
The Oppo Reno16 FS edges out the Oppo Reno12 by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno12 and the Oppo Reno16 FS?
The Oppo Reno12 has a MobileRank rating of 56/100, the Oppo Reno16 FS — 61/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno12 or the Oppo Reno16 FS?
The Oppo Reno16 FS leads on camera score (64/100 vs 40/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno12 over the Oppo Reno16 FS?
The Oppo Reno12 is a better fit for everyday use. The Oppo Reno16 FS is a better fit for everyday use.