Motorola Razr Fold vs Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
The Motorola Razr Fold (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate; launch prices were $1799 and $249. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr Fold leads — 83/100 vs 63/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5000); the Motorola Razr Fold is faster in AnTuTu (3,057,215 vs 971,081); the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is noticeably lighter (178g vs 285g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr Fold
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
What makes Motorola Razr Fold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3057215 vs 971081
- Better Geekbench Single: 2833 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9119 vs 3185
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 58/100)
- Better camera (91/100 vs 61/100)
- Longer battery life (68/100 vs 58/100)
What makes Tecno Camon 50 Ultra better?
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
- Lighter: 178g vs 285g
- Cheaper at launch: $249 vs $1799
- Better display (82/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr Fold vs the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, the Motorola Razr Fold scores 20 points higher (83/100 vs 63/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (90/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (91/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold leads (68/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Motorola Razr Fold — 74/100, Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — 76/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (90/100 vs 58/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (82/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (91/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (74/100 vs 52/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr Fold | Tecno Camon 50 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 971081 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 1061 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 3185 | |
| Display | 8.1" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2480x2200 | 1208x2644 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 164 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6200 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX9 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.1×144.5×4.7 mm | 162.4×77.0×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 285 g | 178 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $249 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr Fold
- 8.1" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr Fold
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 50W
Tecno Camon 50 Ultra
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr Fold and Tecno Camon 50 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr Fold leads Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 214.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1550. Tecno Camon 50 Ultra was $1550 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (90/100 vs 58/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra and the Motorola Razr Fold are nearly equal (82/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra (91/100 vs 61/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr Fold is a bit better (68/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr Fold (74/100 vs 52/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra by 20 points (83/100 vs 63/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr Fold and the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra — 63/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on camera score (91/100 vs 61/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr Fold or the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold leads on performance (90/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr Fold over the Tecno Camon 50 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr Fold is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Tecno Camon 50 Ultra is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.