Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy M17e
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy M17e (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300; launch prices were $1099 and $140. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 43/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy M17e has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 524,785); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy M17e doesn't.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy M17e
- Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 524785
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 1980
- Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (57/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 52/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 55/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 57/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4700 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $140 vs $1099
- Overall rating 43/100
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy M17e, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 33 points higher (76/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 30/100). Value score: Motorola Razr 60 Ultra — 64/100, Samsung Galaxy M17e — 64/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (92/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (94/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (57/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 57/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy M17e | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | 3113462 | 524785 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 1980 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.7" PLS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 167.4×77.4×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | $1099 | $140 |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy M17e
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy M17e
- 6.7" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy M17e
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy M17e, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy M17e by 493.3% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $959. Samsung Galaxy M17e was $959 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (92/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (94/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e (57/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 52/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 57/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy M17e?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy M17e by 33 points (76/100 vs 43/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy M17e?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Samsung Galaxy M17e — 43/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy M17e?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy M17e?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy M17e?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy M17e is a better fit for everyday use.