Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A16
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy A16 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99; estimated prices are $1236 and $118. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 44/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A16 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 503,850).
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy A16
- Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 503850
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 727
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2047
- Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 200g
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 42/100)
- Better camera (57/100 vs 33/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 67/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 60/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
- Cheaper: $118 vs $1236
- Better value for money (72/100 vs 62/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy A16, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 32 points higher (76/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 44/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 leads (72/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (92/100 vs 42/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (94/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (57/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 60/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 is a bit better (72/100 vs 62/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Helio G99 | |
| AnTuTu | 3113462 | 503850 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 727 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 2047 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 14, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 164.4×77.9×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 200 g | |
| Price | $1236 | $118 |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy A16
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A16
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy A16
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy A16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A16 by 517.9% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1118. Samsung Galaxy A16 is cheaper by $1118.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (92/100 vs 42/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (94/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 (57/100 vs 33/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (68/100 vs 60/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A16 is a bit better (72/100 vs 62/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A16?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A16 by 32 points (76/100 vs 44/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy A16?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Samsung Galaxy A16 — 44/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A16?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 33/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A16?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 42/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy A16?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy A16 is a better fit for everyday use.