Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A07 4G
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99; estimated prices are $1236 and $103. By overall MobileRank rating, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads — 76/100 vs 41/100 (a 35-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,113,462 vs 552,286); the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G is noticeably lighter (184g vs 199g).
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy A07 4G
- Higher AnTuTu: 3113462 vs 552286
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 727
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2047
- Faster charging: 68W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (57/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (58/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 43/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
- Lighter: 184g vs 199g
- Cheaper: $103 vs $1236
- Better portability (73/100 vs 68/100)
- Better value for money (66/100 vs 62/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra scores 35 points higher (76/100 vs 41/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (57/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G (92/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G (94/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G (57/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G is a bit better (73/100 vs 68/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (66/100 vs 62/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy A07 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Helio G99 | |
| AnTuTu | 3113462 | 552286 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 727 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 2047 | |
| Display | 7.0" pOLED | 6.7" PLS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1224x2912 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 64GB / 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 171.5×74.0×7.2 mm | 167.4×77.4×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 184 g | |
| Price | $1236 | $103 |
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy A07 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 7.0" pOLED
- Resolution: 1224x2912
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A07 4G
- 6.7" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- Wireless: 30W
Samsung Galaxy A07 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
We compared Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy A07 4G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy A07 4G by 463.7% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $1133. Samsung Galaxy A07 4G is cheaper by $1133.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G (92/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G (94/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G (57/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a bit better (58/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G is a bit better (73/100 vs 68/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G and the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra are nearly equal (66/100 vs 62/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G by 35 points (76/100 vs 41/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G — 41/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on camera score (57/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 60 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy A07 4G?
The Motorola Razr 60 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Samsung Galaxy A07 4G is a better fit for everyday use.