Motorola Razr 50 vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Motorola Razr 50 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300X, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 51/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 879,714); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 92); the Motorola Razr 50 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 50
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Motorola Razr 50 better?
- Lighter: 188g vs 230g
- Better portability (74/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 879714
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2813
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4200 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 30W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 36/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 81/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 50 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 40 points higher (91/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 36/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 (96/100 vs 36/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 (85/100 vs 36/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 50 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (74/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 50 | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300X | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 879714 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 30W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 92 | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 171.3×74.0×7.3 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 50
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 50
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 50
- 4200 mAh
- Wired: 30W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 50 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Motorola Razr 50 by 79.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 50
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 (99/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 (96/100 vs 36/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 (85/100 vs 36/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 50 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (74/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 50 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 by 40 points (91/100 vs 51/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 50 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 50 has a MobileRank rating of 51/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 50 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 36/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 50 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 50 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.