Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $838 and $10498. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 66/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,801,694); the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is noticeably lighter (189g vs 230g).
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 189g vs 230g
- Cheaper: $838 vs $10498
- Better display (91/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (75/100 vs 39/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1801694
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1930
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 4817
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 75/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 58/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 36/100)
- Better value for money (86/100 vs 44/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 25 points higher (91/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 36/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (99/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (91/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (96/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (85/100 vs 36/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (75/100 vs 39/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (86/100 vs 44/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1801694 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1930 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4817 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 171.4×74.0×7.1 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 230 g | |
| Price | $838 | $10498 |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Motorola Razr 50 Ultra by 57.6% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $9660. Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is cheaper by $9660.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (99/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (91/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (96/100 vs 58/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (85/100 vs 36/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (75/100 vs 39/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (86/100 vs 44/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra by 25 points (91/100 vs 66/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 58/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.