Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $838 and $834. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 66/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 1,801,694); the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is noticeably lighter (189g vs 226g).
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Vivo X300 Pro
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 189g vs 226g
- Better display (91/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (75/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 1801694
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1930
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 4817
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 15W
- Cheaper: $834 vs $838
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 75/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 58/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 36/100)
- Better value for money (86/100 vs 44/100)
Comparing the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 21 points higher (87/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 36/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (86/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (93/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (96/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (81/100 vs 36/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (75/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (86/100 vs 44/100).
| Specification | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 1801694 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1930 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4817 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.4×74.0×7.1 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 226 g | |
| Price | $838 | $834 |
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Motorola Razr 50 Ultra by 44.9% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $4. Vivo X300 Pro is cheaper by $4.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (93/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (96/100 vs 58/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (81/100 vs 36/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (75/100 vs 43/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (86/100 vs 44/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra by 21 points (87/100 vs 66/100).
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 58/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.