Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S26
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 (2026) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2600. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads — 75/100 vs 66/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy S26 is faster in AnTuTu (3,161,126 vs 1,797,821); the Samsung Galaxy S26 is noticeably lighter (162g vs 189g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S26
What makes Motorola Razr 50 Ultra better?
- Faster charging: 45W vs 25W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 31/100)
- Better display (91/100 vs 81/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3161126 vs 1797821
- Better Geekbench Single: 2880 vs 1923
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9100 vs 5179
- Lighter: 162g vs 189g
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 75/100)
- Better camera (77/100 vs 58/100)
- Better portability (89/100 vs 75/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy S26, the Samsung Galaxy S26 scores 9 points higher (75/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads (91/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 leads (77/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (91/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (77/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a bit better (36/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 is a bit better (89/100 vs 75/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S26 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Samsung Exynos 2600 | |
| AnTuTu | 1797821 | 3161126 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1923 | 2880 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5179 | 9100 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 2340x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 146 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.4×74.0×7.1 mm | 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 162 g | |
| Launch price | — | $799 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S26
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S26
- 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2340x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Samsung Galaxy S26
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S26, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S26 leads Motorola Razr 50 Ultra by 43.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (91/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (77/100 vs 58/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a bit better (36/100 vs 31/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 is a bit better (89/100 vs 75/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S26?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 edges out the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S26?
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26 — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S26?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 leads on camera score (77/100 vs 58/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S26?
The Samsung Galaxy S26 leads on performance (91/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy S26?
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy S26 is a better fit for gamers and power users.