Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S25+
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Samsung Galaxy S25+ (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ leads — 71/100 vs 66/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy S25+ has the bigger battery (4900 mAh vs 4000); the Samsung Galaxy S25+ is faster in AnTuTu (3,219,688 vs 1,797,821).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S25+
What makes Motorola Razr 50 Ultra better?
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 189g vs 190g
- Better camera (58/100 vs 40/100)
- Better display (91/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (75/100 vs 72/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S25+ better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3219688 vs 1797821
- Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 1923
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9700 vs 5179
- Bigger battery: 4900 vs 4000 mAh
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 75/100)
- Longer battery life (54/100 vs 36/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy S25+, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ scores 5 points higher (71/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ leads (92/100 vs 75/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra leads (58/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ leads (54/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (92/100 vs 75/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S25+ are nearly equal (91/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25+ (58/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (54/100 vs 36/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S25+ are nearly equal (75/100 vs 72/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy S25+ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1797821 | 3219688 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1923 | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5179 | 9700 | |
| Display | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2640 | 3120x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 4900 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 12 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades | Android 15 / One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.4×74.0×7.1 mm | 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 190 g | |
| Launch price | — | $999 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy S25+
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 12MP
Display comparison
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25+
- 6.7" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Samsung Galaxy S25+
- 4900 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S25+, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S25+ leads Motorola Razr 50 Ultra by 44.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (92/100 vs 75/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S25+ are nearly equal (91/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25+ (58/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ notably outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (54/100 vs 36/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S25+ are nearly equal (75/100 vs 72/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S25+?
The Samsung Galaxy S25+ edges out the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy S25+?
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Samsung Galaxy S25+ — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S25+?
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra leads on camera score (58/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy S25+?
The Samsung Galaxy S25+ leads on performance (92/100 vs 75/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy S25+?
The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a better fit for active users. The Samsung Galaxy S25+ is a better fit for gamers and power users.