Honor 200 Pro vs Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
The Honor 200 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor 200 Pro leads — 74/100 vs 66/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Honor 200 Pro has the bigger battery (5200 mAh vs 4000); the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (1,797,821 vs 1,698,060); the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is thinner (7.1mm vs 8.2mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 200 Pro
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
What makes Honor 200 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 5200 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 66W vs 15W
- Better camera (70/100 vs 58/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 36/100)
What makes Motorola Razr 50 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 1797821 vs 1698060
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 189g vs 199g
- Better display (91/100 vs 83/100)
- Better portability (75/100 vs 57/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 200 Pro vs the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra, the Honor 200 Pro scores 8 points higher (74/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 200 Pro leads (70/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 Pro leads (80/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 75/100. In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor 200 Pro is a bit better (70/100 vs 58/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (80/100 vs 36/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (75/100 vs 57/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 200 Pro | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 | |
| AnTuTu | 1698060 | 1797821 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1923 | 1923 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5179 | 5179 | |
| Display | 6.8" OLED | 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1224x2700 | 1080x2640 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 66W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 137 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 4 major Android upgrades, MagicOS 8 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4000 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IPX8 | |
| Dimensions | 163.3×75.2×8.2 mm | 171.4×74.0×7.1 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 189 g | |
| Launch price | $700 | — |
Camera comparison
Honor 200 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor 200 Pro
- 6.8" OLED
- Resolution: 1224x2700
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- 6.9" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2640
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 200 Pro
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 66W
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 200 Pro and Motorola Razr 50 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra leads Honor 200 Pro by 5.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 75/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor 200 Pro is a bit better (70/100 vs 58/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor 200 Pro significantly outperforms the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra (80/100 vs 36/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 Pro (75/100 vs 57/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 200 Pro or the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra?
The Honor 200 Pro edges out the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor 200 Pro and the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra?
The Honor 200 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra — 66/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 200 Pro or the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra?
The Honor 200 Pro leads on camera score (70/100 vs 58/100).
Should you choose the Honor 200 Pro over the Motorola Razr 50 Ultra?
The Honor 200 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life. The Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is a better fit for active users.